What's wrong with this bad boy?
Ignoring the classically demagogic reference to "secretive oil billionaires," we let Investor's Business Daily tell the tale.
- The figure cited for "clean-energy jobs" is the number of existing jobs that can be so classified.
- The number of such jobs has not been growing at the same rate as other jobs.
- The number of such jobs has declined more rapidly than others in the recession.
- Meanwhile, declines in energy imports relate to the drop in demand caused by the recession.
Then there's the claim about ethics. The lefty fact-checker cited has noted that the characterization of BHO's administration as highly ethical was withdrawn when BHO started issuing wholesale numbers waivers to ethics requirements.
Still, let's set aside the questionable assertions. These are, we must assume, the best that the Obamanoids have for 2012. Is a majority of the Electoral College prepared to cast votes in favor of clean energy and meticulous ethics, against considerations of jobs and fiscal sanity?
Most disturbing to any of the 80% of Democrats prepared to cast votes for Obama in November should be the utter congruence of the Case for Obama's 2012 Reelection with the Case for Carter's 1980 Reelection: "I'm Clean, I'm Green, and By Golly, People Like Me."